Build Brief

Governed Wedding Planning Marketplace

Wedding planning crosses couples, vendors, communications, money, documents, and sensitive personal context, so agent assistance needs visible human control at every consequential step.

Wedding Planning / Marketplace2026

Context

What made the work consequential.

The product had to coordinate a multi-party planning journey without treating generated guidance as authority, exposing private context, or allowing payment and vendor actions to outrun explicit approval.

Key decisions and interventions

Agent assistance stayed inside human-approved marketplace paths.

Designed planning actions around human review and approval

Connected vendor, communication, and payment workflows without collapsing their control boundaries

Introduced privacy and marketplace safeguards for sensitive planning context

Kept the public-facing surface within an internal-testing evidence boundary

Artifacts and capability

Planning, vendors, communications, and payments gained explicit boundaries.

  • Human-approved planning workflow
  • Vendor and communication foundations
  • Payment-control boundaries
  • Privacy and marketplace safeguards

Current implementation evidence

What the available evidence supports.

Repository and test evidence support an internally tested marketplace foundation with governed planning, vendor, communication, payment, and privacy flows. They do not establish marketplace traction, completed customer journeys, or production readiness.

A similar challenge?

Bring the operating context, not the confidential detail.

We can establish fit before sensitive architecture, security, or program information enters the conversation.

Discuss a similar mandate