Project Brief

Luxury Acquisition Pricing Intelligence

Direct-from-individual intake at 50–150 items per day depended on spreadsheets and operator knowledge, while authentication stayed outsourced and acquisition volume kept growing.

Retail / Applied AI2026

Context

What made the work consequential.

Acquisition decisions had to close same-day, but pricing was inconsistent across operators, historical buy-to-sell outcomes were not systematically exploited, and a generic ML pitch would fail the client's engine-depth evaluation.

Key decisions and interventions

Acquisition pricing moved behind a confidence gate.

Prioritized an Acquisition Value MVP before listing optimization to prove pricing value first

Designed a data foundation over Shopify-class catalog history, pricing reference, and buy-to-sell outcomes

Specified a gradient-boosted acquisition engine with comparables and an 85% confidence gate

Planned a React operator UI and accuracy dashboard with deterministic margin rules as source of truth

Artifacts and capability

Operators gained a governed recommendation loop.

  • Acquisition Value MVP architecture and scope
  • Data foundation and category qualification approach
  • Confidence-gated pricing recommendation model
  • Operator UI and accuracy dashboard design

Current implementation evidence

What the available evidence supports.

The designed MVP is expected to place at least 80% of acquisition recommendations within ±10% of sell price on qualifying categories, surface prices only at or above 85% confidence, and reach a median decision time under two minutes. Business outcomes have not yet been independently verified.

A similar challenge?

Bring the operating context, not the confidential detail.

We can establish fit before sensitive architecture, security, or program information enters the conversation.

Discuss a similar mandate